
Subscribe to
Computerworld
or
Other Hardware Stories
|
August 19, 2002 (PC World) -- A small group of PC owners has quietly filed a class-action lawsuit against Intel Corp., Gateway Inc., and Hewlett-Packard Co., alleging that the companies misled them into believing the Pentium 4 was a superior processor to Intel's own Pentium III and the Athlon from Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
The complaint -- Neubauer et al. v. Intel et al. -- was filed June 3 in the Third Judicial Circuit in Madison County, Ill. The case is in limbo awaiting a ruling on whether it belongs in a state or federal jurisdiction and has not yet achieved class-action status. It came to light this week after a copy of the complaint was sent to PCWorld.com anonymously.
The plaintiffs claim that the companies deceived the public when marketing Intel's flagship processor and allege that it is "the material fact that there is no benefit to consumers in choosing the Pentium 4 over the Pentium III." The complaint alleges that "the Pentium 4 is less powerful and slower than the Pentium III and/or the AMD Athlon."
Noting the sheer number of Pentium 4s Intel has sold, the complaint goes on to say the class "is so numerous that the individual joinder of all members is impracticable" and that the class could include "hundreds of thousands of members." According to MicroDesign Resources in Sunnyvale, Calif., Intel has shipped upwards of 50 million Pentium 4s since the chip was launched in November 2000 (see story).
The complaint doen't name the monetary amount sought by the plaintiffs. It does, however, cite what it says is law in California -- where the companies are based -- that each plaintiff is entitled to actual damages, restitution of property and punitive damages. The complaint notes that the cumulative total would be less than $75,000 each.
Attorneys Stephen M. Tillery and Aaron M. Zigler of the law firm Carr Korein Tillery in St. Louis filed the complaint on behalf of five plaintiffs. The firm declined to comment about the case, but Zigler confirmed the June 3 filing.
Intel and Gateway executives also declined to comment about the complaint, citing company policies regarding ongoing litigation. HP didn't return calls seeking comment.
The plaintiffs don't appear to be accusing Intel of lying about the Pentium 4's clock speed, said Rob Enderle, a research fellow at Giga Information Group Inc. They're complaining about the chip's performance, and that's a crucial element to the case's viability, he said.
"As long as the market is going after megahertz, and Intel is reporting the correct megahertz, then I do not think this is actionable," he said. "Megahertz is misleading, but that has to do with the fact that the industry doesn't use benchmarks."
Enderle said the PC industry should throw out megahertz altogether as a system of measuring performance. The actual clock speed matters less than the overall system performance, he said.
"The right answer really is benchmarks," he said. "We need to have a way that people can really see the difference between PCs."
In fact, in the tech industry several benchmarks have achieved enough coverage to qualify as industry standards. However, it's unlikely any one benchmark would satisfy the legion of vendors that build the components of any one PC.
AMD took matters into its own hands with its launch of the Athlon XP processor last October, when it also introduced a new naming convention that attaches faster-sounding names to AMD's slower-running chips. Results have been mixed.
|
|
Print this Story |
|
Send Us Feedback |
|
E-mail this Story |
|
Digg this Story |
|
Slashdot this Story |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Zones Application Performance Zone Business Continuity Zone Data Center Management Zone Enterprise-Class Security Zone The File Data Management Zone Grid Computing on Windows Zone Security Management Zone ITIL Best Practices Zone The SAS Zone Storage Virtualization Zone Business Intelligence and Analytics Zone |
|
|
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|

Cost Effective Scaling with Virtualization and Coyote Point Systems An overview of the industry trend toward virtualization, how server consolidation has increased the importance of application uptime and the steps being taken to integrate load balancing technology with virtualized servers.
Download this white paper now!
|

Get Into Gear!Check out our new personal technology section -- TechGear -- for the latest on those cool gadgets that you just gotta have! Host Mike Elgan provides hands-on reviews and analysis of the stuff that makes IT fun. Head to TechGear
|

| Detect, identify, and locate RF interference in 802.11 WLANs. AnalyzeAir software provides IT network professionals with the vision they need into the hidden world of RF, providing them with the ability to see the spectrum in a visible and intelligible format. AnalyzeAir software lets you see, monitor, analyze, and manage all the RF sources and wireless devices that influence your Wi-Fi network's performance and security, even if those devices are unauthorized or transient. AnalyzeAir Trial Software v3.1 highlights the features found in AnalyzeAir Software using a set of saved spectrum files. Replay the data and experience the visibility that AnalyzeAir Wi-Fi Spectrum Analyzer provides. Note: The trial software is limited to a player version only. It does not communicate with an AnalyzeAir PC card so it does not collect actual spectrum data. Register for this trial now.
|
| About Us Advertise Contacts Editorial Calendar Help Desk Jobs at IDG Privacy Policy Reprints Site Map |
|
CIO The Industry Standard |